Both a loan and a pawn can be potentially convenient ways to get much-needed financing on a short basis, but there is often some confusion about the fine line between the two. The following differences should be kept in mind so that you are always aware of the exact specifics that either getting a loan or pawning an item respectively entail.
Pawn approval depends on the offering of collateral
What mainly distinguishes pawns from loans is the fact that a pawn is based entirely on collateral. Pawning entails that you relinquish legal possession of one or more of your possessions as an offer of collateral. The collateral that you offer is used as a failsafe for the lender in case you are unable to pay back the amount that is disbursed.
Loan approval depends on an examination of the applicant
Unlike a pawn, in which the value of a physical item is the only point of concern, a loan necessitates that the financial history of the individual requesting the loan is examined. The applicant’s credit score and any existing debts will all be central factors.
The amount of money given for an approved pawn request depends on the prospective selling power of the collateral
Unlike a loan, the exact amount that is lent for a pawned item is based on the amount of money that the pawn shop believes it could potentially sell the collateral for. Essentially, it will be up to the pawn shop’s discretion in determining the potential profitability of your item.
The amount of financial assistance given for an approved personal loan depends on creditworthiness
Unlike the amount of money given for a pawn, the amount of money given for a personal loan will depend on the creditworthiness of the applicant. Essentially, the lender must determine that the applicant is more likely than not to pay them back.
Personal loan lenders must accept more of a risk than pawn lenders
Due to the fact that a pawned item acts as a form of collateral for the amount of money that is loaned, there is generally far less risk incurred by the pawn lender in general. Due to the fact that the legal contract guarantees their title to whatever was offered to them as collateral, there is very little at stake in terms of what they stand to lose.
Because a loan is determined entirely on how likely it appears that the applicant will be capable of paying back the interest, there is no full guarantee that the lender will be compensated for whatever it is that was loaned. Lenders of personal loans have far more risk than pawn lenders, which increases the amount of discretion that generally must be exercised.